Re: memrchr() implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:33:01PM +0800, Tay Ray Chuan wrote:

> I'm writing a patch that requires the use of memrchr(). [1] As far as
> I know, memrchr() is non-standard.

Yep.

> So what's the best way to get git to use memrchr()?
> 
> I was thinking of getting git to use glibc's implementation if glibc
> is present, if not, use a naive implementation included in git's code
> base [2].

Yeah, that's our usual strategy; see how strchrnul is implemented for an
example.

Since you are doing this for speed and not ease-of-use, I assume you are
benchmarking stock git versus glibc's optimized memrchr. I'd be curious
to see a comparison to your naive implementation, too, just to
double-check that your attempt at speeding up doesn't make things worse
on non-glibc platforms.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]