Hi Junio, On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > ... In the next commit this will be changed in order to make sure that > > 'master..master' does export master. > > Sorry, but you need to be much more clear why this could be a good > thing. Maybe we should have written 'master^0..master' or 'blub..blah' where 'blah' points to the same commit as 'blub'. The problem is that we need to be able to tell which _ref_ is uninteresting, not which _commit_, since one and the same commit can be referenced by an uninteresting and an interesting ref. Hopefully you will excuse our being a little incoherent after a codathon, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html