I found that in my research but my IT "department" recommended a tool they're already using. I'll push Gerrit again. Is there an online demo? Sent from my iPad On Jul 24, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Thomas Adam <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 24 July 2011 13:12, Mathew Benson <mathew.benson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'm planning to use git for a work project, which requires tight control of the peer review process. In previous jobs, the peer review was a tedious manual process of creating PDF files, writing comments in spreadsheets, and copying comments to the CM system. I want to use technology to my best advantage. >> >> Once a developer has completed all his changes in his development branch, what's the best way to get those files to the reviewers, without requiring the author to stop work? First, I think I should create a tag in the developer branch. Each developer has a local repository, and my review tool writes files directly in the work area. Can they just fetch, checkout a tag (don't know how to do that), commit changes, and push it back to the central repository? Is there a better workflow?-- > > This is what Gerrit is useful for. > > -- Thomas Adam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html