Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add a test to check that git ls-tree sets non-zero exit code on error.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>  t/t3103-ls-tree-missing-tree.sh |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100755 t/t3103-ls-tree-missing-tree.sh
>
> I'd rather not waste a new test number for something trivial like this.
> Don't we already have a script that tests ls-tree?
>

Happy to take suggestions about which other test I should modify to
include this one and how that should be renamed (if at all).

The other tests t3100 -> t3102 are all currently quite coherent and focused.

Perhaps a rename &/or merge of existing tests is required?

FYI: t31xx has quite a lot of head room (e.g. there are still 96 names
available in that space)

jon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]