Am 23.07.2011 14:27, schrieb Jon Seymour: > Fails at this commit, fixed by subsequent commit. Maybe use "test_expect_failure" here and change that to "test_expect_success" in the next commit? > Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > t/t3103-ls-tree-missing-tree.sh | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100755 t/t3103-ls-tree-missing-tree.sh > > diff --git a/t/t3103-ls-tree-missing-tree.sh b/t/t3103-ls-tree-missing-tree.sh > new file mode 100755 > index 0000000..365ac07 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/t/t3103-ls-tree-missing-tree.sh > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ > +#!/bin/sh > + > +test_description='ls-tree exits with non-zero status if it also reports an error' > + > +. ./test-lib.sh > + > +test_expect_success 'setup' ' > + mkdir a && > + touch a/one && > + git add a/one && > + git commit -m test > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'ls-tree fails with non-zero exit code on broken tree' ' > + rm -f .git/objects/5f/cffbd6e4c5c5b8d81f5e9314b20e338e3ffff5 && > + test_must_fail git ls-tree -r HEAD > +' > + > +test_done -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html