Re: [PATCH 36/48] merge-recursive: Provide more info in conflict markers with file renames

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Whenever there are merge conflicts in file contents, we would mark the
> different sides of the conflict with the two branches being merged.
> However, when there is a rename involved as well, the branchname is not
> sufficient to specify where the conflicting content came from.  In such
> cases, mark the two sides of the conflict with branchname:filename rather
> than just branchname.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>

Nice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]