Andy Parkins wrote: > Raimund Bauer offered this suggestion (paraphrased): > > "Maybe we could do git-commit -a _only_ if the index matches HEAD, and > otherwise keep current behavior? So people who don't care about the > index won't get tripped up, and when you do have a dirty index, you get > told about it?" > > Johannes Schindelin pointed out that this isn't the right thing to do for > an --amend, so that is checked for. > > Additionally, it's probably not the right thing to do if any files are > specified with "--only" or "--include", so they turn this behaviour off > as well. Could we add suggestion by Andreas Ericsson to print in the "smart commit" case: Nothing to commit but changes in working tree. Assuming 'git commit -a' or something like that? -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html