Re: [PATCH 29/48] merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> ...  The reason this change works is due to the changes of the
> last few patches to (a) record_df_conflict_files instead of just unlinking
> them early, (b) allowing make_room_for_path() to remove D/F entries, and
> (c) the splitting of update_stages_and_entry() to have its functionality
> called at different points.

Nice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]