On Thursday 30 November 2006 09:01, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > On 11/30/06, Raimund Bauer <ray007@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Carl Worth wrote, On 30.11.2006 01:05: > > > Let's help people do exactly that by making the behavior of "git > > > commit -a" be the default for "git commit". > > > > Maybe we could do that _only_ if the index matches HEAD, and otherwise > > keep current behavior? > > I hate the if clause. Suppose I prefer update-index way, I would have > to check whether HEAD matches index everytime I do a commit to make > sure it won't do the other way. No you won't. If you don't use update-index, then index will match HEAD and you will commit changes in the working tree. That is the way for newbies As soon as you do the first update-index the index will no longer match HEAD, so commit will do the same as it does now. And if you are not sure which you have done then presumably you do what you do now, or git commit -a or git commit -i as you need. -- Alan Chandler http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html