Re: git and bzr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 30 November 2006 06:59, Raimund Bauer wrote:
> Maybe we could do that _only_ if the index matches HEAD, and otherwise
> keep current behavior?
> So people who don't care about the index won't get tripped up, and when
> you do have a dirty index, you get told about it?
>

I have been(silently)  following the git commit discussion and started being 
fully on the side of git commit -a being the default, but was slowly moving 
over towards the git commit -i being the default camp.

This post seems like a Eureka moment - chew over the problem long enough and 
someone comes in from left field with an off the wall remark that suddenly 
clarifies everything.



-- 
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]