Re: Git commit generation numbers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> It should actually work in that scenario, at least with replace refs,...
> regenerate it. Another run ...

I know; that is what I called "doubt it would really work". Having to
regenerate twice does not count as working.

> However, there are two issues:
>
>   1. I don't think grafts have a "respect grafts" flag in the same way;
>      I haven't looked at how the packing code decides not to respect
>      them, but the "stir graft info into the checksum" data should use
>      the same check.

I do not think graft and object transfer meshes well at all, so I wouldn't
worry about it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]