Re: [RFC] control, what refs are honored by core.logAllRefUpdates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King wrote:

> I think I'd rather see something more syntactically explicit for
> resetting, though, like:
>
>   [core]
>     autoLogRef = heads
>     autoLogRef = remotes
>     autoLogRef = notes
>     !autoLogRef
>     autoLogref = heads
>
> (for that matter, I have often wished that "!autoLogRef" was boolean
> false, just as "autoLogRef" is boolean true). But it may not be worth
> changing the config syntax for.

Sounds worthwhile to me.  I've (probably irrationally) wished before
for an abbreviation for "bare = false", too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]