Is it common to have a different name for each branch, descriptive of the project is contains or is it more common to have one dedicated name (for instance QA2) for the branch on which projects change based on need. Best -- View this message in context: http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/Naming-Conventions-for-Branches-tp6576242p6576242.html Sent from the git mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html