Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/3] upload-archive: use start_command instead of fork

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:25:00AM +0200, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:43:09PM +0200, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> >
> >> The POSIX-function fork is not supported on Windows. Use our
> >> start_command API instead.
> >
> > Is start_command the right solution? From my reading, the fork is
> > actually because we want to set up a sideband multiplexer. Should we not
> > just be using start_async() to start a thread, as we do in receive-pack?
> 
> I considered that, but discarded it because I figured it required me
> to plug through a file descriptor all the way through the code. But
> perhaps I was wrong, and dup2 will make that job a lot easier?

Yeah, exactly. The current code is already using dup2 in the same way.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]