On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 14:21 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > +static void verify_opt_mutually_compatible(const char *me, ...)
> > +{
>
> Isn't "being compatible" by definition "mutual"?
As a strict matter of language, no. And example we see far too often
@work is that MS Office 2010 is compatible with MS Office 2007, but the
same cannot be said the other way around. (Now if I can convince them
that not everyone in the world has MS Office...)
>
> I.e. verify-option-compatibility perhaps?
+1 sensible, if that's the intention.
--
-Drew Northup
________________________________________________
"As opposed to vegetable or mineral error?"
-John Pescatore, SANS NewsBites Vol. 12 Num. 59
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html