On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 21:52 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Martin von Zweigbergk wrote: > > > That reminds me that <branch> may not have been specified. How about > > saying things more explicitly like this? > > > > Abort the rebase operation and reset HEAD to the original branch. If > > <branch> was provided when the rebase operation was started, then > > HEAD will be reset to <branch>. Otherwise HEAD will be reset to > > where it was when the rebase operation was started. > > Sounds great to me for what it's worth. (With the caveat that "git > rebase --abort" reattaches HEAD in addition to what "git reset --hard" > would do, but I think it's fine to just leave that implied.) Agreed, that is better. -- -Drew Northup ________________________________________________ "As opposed to vegetable or mineral error?" -John Pescatore, SANS NewsBites Vol. 12 Num. 59 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html