Am 6/21/2011 7:08, schrieb Andrew Wong: > Ah, this patch will be very useful. I actually ran into several scenarios > before where I wished stash could do exactly this. > > On 11-06-20 9:36 PM, David Caldwell wrote: >> On 6/20/11 5:38 PM, Jeff King wrote: >>> Hmm. I think I would call this something like "--untracked", as to me >>> the main function is saving those files, not cleaning them afterwards >>> (the fact that they are cleaned is really just making the untracked-file >>> handling in line with what we do for tracked files; we put the changes >>> in the stash and remove them from the working tree). >> >> I see your point but I thought "--clean" was pretty descriptive of how >> the working dir ended up afterward. Maybe "git stash --everything" (or >> "--all")? > I personally think "--untracked" (and -u) is more intuitive too, since it > tells you what "git stash" is about to do. i.e. "git stash" is about to do > the usual stash operation *and* also stash the "untracked" files. Really? $ git stash --untracked sound like it stashes *only* untracked files. (That by itself may be a feature that some people want; so far, I'm not among them.) -- Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html