Aaron Bentley wrote: > Jakub Narebski wrote: >> Well, I gues that with "annotate friendly" (weave or knit) storage >> annotate/blame would be faster. But fast annotate was not one of the >> design goals of git. >> >> How fast is "bzr annotate"? > > $ time bzr annotate builtins.py > /dev/null > > real 0m1.479s > user 0m1.430s > sys 0m0.030s > > builtins.py has 953 ancestor revisions (i.e. revisions that modified > it) and 3016 lines. > > That's on a machine with 4141.87 Bogomips. I did optimize annotate > slightly, but I'm submitting the optimization for our 0.14.0 release. Hmmm... git-blame (without contents moving or rename detection) takes around 2s user+sys on 2002 BogoMIPS machine, as compared to 1.5s user+sys for bzr annotate on 4141.87 BogoMIPS machine. revision.c has 1208 lines, 62 unique commits in git-blame output, 90 commits history, 102 commits full history. -- Jakub Narebski Poland - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html