Re: git log --follow doesn't follow a rename over a merge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James Blackburn <jamesblackburn@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Given the file was removed during my 'merge' graft in commit X,
> shouldn't it be visible  in log without --simplify-merges?

The merge simplification logic does not treat earlier parent commits any
differently than later parent commits of a merge (except when two parents
are the same with respect to a given pathspec, and if the logic needs to
pick only one, the earlier parent will be picked), and that is by design.

So the short answer is no.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]