Re: [PATCH 6/6] zlib: zlib can only process 4GB at a time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Erik Faye-Lund wrote:

> Looking a bit more at the code, it seems that we currently use
> "unsigned long" a lot of places where "size_t" should have been used.

As Junio's comment about 32-bit platforms hints, when it comes to be
the time to change all those places, wouldn't off_t be a better
choice?

Thanks --- it is exciting to watch this topic move forward, inch by
inch.  And thanks for the hint about invalid word size == sizeof(long)
assumptions on Windows.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]