Dave Zarzycki <zarzycki@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Personally speaking, I don't think we're masking failures any more than > git is masking failures when it doesn't find a ref in .git/refs and it > falls back to .git/packed-refs. That is not even a fallback. If a loose ref is found, the corresponding entry in packed-refs is *STALE* and should *NEVER* be looked at. Back to the topic. If a host advertises that it can be reached at any of these addresses, then you can say these addresses are fall-back for each other. It is fine not to report about addresses we tried but didn't get connection as long as we manage to reach it in one of the addresses. We do not report other addresses we didn't even try, and it is not useful to report earlier addresses we tried but didn't get the dial tone in such a case. As Peff said, if we failed to reach any connection, reporting all failed addresses would give the user a better clue when diagnosing the network problem. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html