On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:41:25AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> > BTW. what do you think about treating repository with own refs and with
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > namespaces similarly to how "forks" are handled in gitweb now?
>
> Different namespaces won't necessarily represent forks of the same
> repository; they may represent entirely separate repositories, with the
> use of namespaces merely a server-side implementation detail to save
> space. I'd suggest presenting them as separate repositories.
What I wanted to say that if repository with namespaces has its own
not namespaced refs, then (sub)namespaces are probably forks, and
"forks"-like behavior would be a good idea.
If namespaced repository serves only to save space, then it wouldn't
have its own refs, only namespaced ones. Then we would list them
as separate repositories.
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html