Re: [PATCH] (experimental) per-topic shortlog.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:43:49PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> BTW merge-recursive is a perfect example why this approach will break 
> down: most of the rewrite in C took place in a private repository with 
> quite some commits. This does not show in the git repository.
> 
> I fully expect the linux repository to behave similarly, since most of the 
> features are cooked elsewhere, and not all of them are pulled, but some 
> are applied (i.e. they appear out of nowhere from the repository's 
> viewpoint).

Yes, I think this would be more useful in concert with some sort of
grouping. If we can make a group of commits related to merge-recursive,
and score them as a single item, then they can be compared to other
groups (which may consist of a single commit or several).

-Peff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]