Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, 6 June 2011, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > So what you suggest would make > > $ git diff NEXT WTREE > > behave differently from > > $ git diff > > and > > $ git diff HEAD NEXT > > behave differently from > > $ git diff --cached > > Do you really think that it is good idea? I do not know if Michael is suggesting to make it different, but if the difference is an improvement, it may be a good thing. Being different from the current behaviour should not be a basis for automatic rejection --- otherwise we won't make any progress. I just don't know what the plans by advocates of this NEXT/WTREE are for conflicted cases [*1*] to tell how they want to make the user experience, so I cannot even tell if they want something different, let alone to judge if the proposed difference is an improvement. [Footnote] *1* There may be other equally important corner cases, but let's tackle one simple and obvious thing first to see where this goes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html