On 06/03/2011 07:16 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jens Lehmann<Jens.Lehmann@xxxxxx> writes:
The "how about this" patch you are voting against (I am neutral by the
way) is a response to your earlier "I have three use cases and the current
implementation is forgetting the third", which in turn was a response to
my "your third use case does not count, so the updated wording of the
documentation is wrong---it should say 'do not', not 'cannot'".
So what should the updated document say?
If I understand this correctly, the third use case isn't actually
unique: if the upstream repo is on a local file system, why not just use
a file://... url for the super project's origin?
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html