Jeff King wrote: > Having said that, this would be really easy to support, and I don't > think would have any negative compatibility consequences, as long as we > don't support blame.date. But I don't think we're breaking anybody > relying on "git annotate --date=whatever" being silently ignored, as > that option has never done anything useful. > > The patch would look like this: Looks obviously good to me. Chengwei (and anyone else), would you be interested in moving this forward by adding tests and perhaps documentation? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html