> Matthieu Moy wrote: >> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> If so, I don't understand why the distinction between 1) and 2) is >> necessary, and why not to fetch directly into refs/remotes/origin/. IOW, >> in which case is refs/remotes/origin/master different from >> refs/mediawiki/origin/master for example? > > That's a good question. One answer is that fetching to elsewhere > allows the transport machinery to take care of rejecting non-fast-forward > fetches and pretty-printing the ref update information: > > From mediawiki::http://localhost/mediawiki > 479ee21..accd2c1 master -> origin/master > > I think in the long term, importing to no ref at all as Sverre > suggested and teaching the transport-helper to do the ref update would > make more sense. Well yes that would indeed make more sense. It feels weird to have to do it like this. Anyways, thanks a lot again for your help, a rfc patch should come relatively quickly with the project in its current state. Regards, -- Jérémie Nikaes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html