Re: [PATCH 1/2] t7508: demonstrate status's failure to use --porcelain format with -z

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brandon Casey <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> By the way, don't we however also want to make sure -z does not kick in
>> automatically when other options like "short" or "normal" is given?

Heh, the above obviously does not make sense. What I meant was "if you
have -z but also --short or something other than --porcelain, -z should
not cause the command to fall back to --porcelain".

> It seems it was intended to be able to do
>
>    git status -z --short

Yes, you are of course right; in this case we shouldn't do either normal
nor porcelain; we should do NUL-terminated short output.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]