Re: [PATCH 08/10] revert: Introduce HEAD, TODO files to persist state, plan

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

Ramkumar Ramachandra writes:
> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>> And with that, this would no longer depend on the (valuable enough on
>> their own terms) patches 1 and 2 so they could be treated as a
>> separate series, no?
>
> Yes, but I'd like to keep 1 and 2 in this series, if that's alright.
> Another series will have to take care of error handling more
> extensively.
> With a few tests, would it be useful to get this series merged in? It
> implements '--abort', which is already useful.

There's a good way to create a separation between patches 1-2, and the
rest- thanks to Jonathan's suggestion on IRC.
Junio: Would you like to merge just the first two patches? I'll
continue working on the rest, and try to come up with something useful
to merge in another week or two.

-- Ram
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]