Re: [PATCH 0/2] gitweb: Improve handling of configuration files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"J.H." <warthog9@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I would argue against this, for a couple of reasons:
>
> 1) Git itself treats /etc/git.conf in this exact manor,...
> Case in point turning on things like updateserverinfo, or automatic packing.

If we read both from the beginning of time it would have been more
convenient, and I agree with that 100%. So this is not a valid reason to
"argue against this".

> 2) Trying to get people to do includes in their config files, or to
> completely ignore the system wide config isn't a sustainable practice.

I also agree with this.

In any case, I do not think we have to choose between Jakub's two patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]