On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [ resending to the mailing list too ] > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Michael J Gruber > <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Francis Moreau venit, vidit, dixit 11.05.2011 18:11: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm using "git cherry old master base" to see if all commits between >>> master and base have been applied in my 'old' branch. >>> >>> So I expect that git cherry is using a list of commits given by : "git >>> rev-list --no-merges base..master". >> >> Not really. >> >> For each commit in "--no-merges old..master ^base" (i.e. "--no-merges >> master ^old ^base"), "git cherry" checks whether there is a patch >> equivalent commit in "--no-merges master..old", and outputs it with + or -. >> > > oh you're right, I missed the case when old has been merged in master. > BTW, can't it be convenient for users if git-cherry also displays the sha1 of the commits which have been merged upstream (the ones with the '-' sign) ? Thanks -- Francis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html