Re: [PATCH 0/4] i18n: Add shell script translation infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Heya,

[+msysgit people]

On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 23:38, Ãvar ArnfjÃrà Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 19:03, Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 14:10, Ãvar ArnfjÃrà Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> This adds skeleton no-op functions to git-sh-i18n.sh analogous to the
>>> gettext.c skeleton functions for C, adds *.sh scripts to the "pot"
>>> target for message extraction, and updates the git-sh-i18n--envsubst
>>> tests to use the new test_i18ncmp function.
>>
>> I seem to remember there were some concerns about performance with a
>> previous version of this series. Have you done any before/after
>> timings on, say, the git test suite? Or am I remembering incorrectly?
>
> When I benchmark this on my (Linux) system it runs at 0% difference
> between the current test suite and the one with this series.
>
> The concern was about Windows, where forks are more expensive, so
> e.g. every time we shell out to sed/awk/perl/grep or
> git-sh-i18n--envsubst we incur a larger speed hit than on Unix
> systems.

Perhaps one of the windows devs can benchmark this then? Ãvar, where
do you have a pullable version of this series? Your github fork has
quite a few branches.

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]