Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] better document 'interactive.singlekey' and '--patch'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Valentin Haenel <valentin.haenel@xxxxxx> writes:

> Note that the first patch is already included in pu (93556471), but I
> included it here again since its part of the series. Is that the right
> thing to do, or could I have dropped it?

To me it does not make much of a difference either way.

I usually try to apply a rerolled series at the same fork point as the
previous round, and discard the earlier ones after verifying if they are
identical between the two rounds (both trees and log message wording).  It
becomes irritating when the changes I find in this process only reverts
what I fixed-up when I queued the previous round, but on the other hand,
a complete re-send will give the patch a new chance to be reviewed by
different people, so...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]