Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Rerolled. Waiting for comments.
>
> Should I extract first two commits i.e.
>
> - Remove gitweb/gitweb.cgi and other legacy targets from main Makefile
> - git-instaweb: Simplify build dependency on gitweb
>
> into a separate patch series? Even though their existence was
> ...
> I think this cleanup is worthy on its own.
Sounds like a good idea. Thanks.
>> * jn/ctags (2011-04-29) 6 commits
>> - gitweb: Optional grouping of projects by category
>> - gitweb: Modularized git_get_project_description to be more generic
>> - gitweb: Split git_project_list_body in two functions
>> - gitweb: Mark matched 'ctag' / contents tag (?by_tag=foo)
>> - gitweb: Change the way "content tags" ('ctags') are handled
>> - gitweb: Restructure projects list generation
>>
>> Waiting for comments.
>
> Should I do and post benchmarks for
>
> - gitweb: Restructure projects list generation
>
> change (when 'forks' feature is used)?
>
> Note that "gitweb: Mark matched 'ctag' / contents tag (?by_tag=foo)"
> has ACK from Petr Baudis ('pasky').
... meaning the first three in the series? I missed that. Thanks for a
reminder.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html