Re: [PATCH 1/1] Honor $(prefix) set in config.mak* when defining ETC_GIT* and sysconfdir

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kacper Kornet <kornet@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Should the patch be based on main or on the previous patch that was
> merged to next?

After having this much discussion, it is preferrable to have a patch
relative to what you have in 'next' (2910bf5) as a fix-up, explaining "The
initial version does not cover these cases / has these problems" to
summarize the discussion so far, followed by explanation of the
incremental change "Fix this and that by doing ...".

We could revert what is in 'next' and start from scratch, but then it is
likely that the thought process will be lost when you write the log
message.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]