Re: [RFC] require-work-tree wants more than what its name says

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Check out some of the older scripts in contrib/examples. Several of them
> require_work_tree, but do not cd_to_toplevel immediately; instead, they
> do it much later for some specific bits.

Another datapoint I found was "clean".

It used to say "you have to be inside work tree" in the scripted version.
Imagine what builtin/clean.c does today?  It has NEED_WORK_TREE bit in the
command table in git.c and that bit means "We need to have a work tree
that we can later chdir to if we wanted to".



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]