Re: Creating remote branch called HEAD corrupts remote clones

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Stephen Kelly <steveire@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> No, it's still an issue, and I believe I pin-pointed it in my first
>>> mail. You can try out the patch I sent, and see if that helps in your
>>> case. If it does, I think it'd make sense to do something (preferably
>>> a bit more robust) with it.
>
> I don't have a build of git at the moment to test it as I'm using
> distro packages again. The only test case I have is the alice and bob
> stuff already posted, so if your patch fixes that for you that's good
> enough from my POV.

As I said, 'gitk --all' works fine, the patch would fix 'gitk'.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]