Re: [RFC/largely untested/PATCH] sha1_name: interpret ~n as HEAD~n

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Heya,

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 00:34, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So there really isn't a lot of consistency, I guess. ÂIt also conflicts
> a little with the shell's "~user" syntax, though presumably you don't
> have users named "1" and "2".

FWIW, I like the patch, mainly because I dislike typing HEAD~n (I
usually mispel it as HEA~n) and agree with peff's analysis, we're such
a long way from being any form of consistent that I don't see this
breaking any user expectations.

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]