Re: RFC: a plugin architecture for git extensions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joey Hess <joey@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Tools like autoconf etc already know how to install man pages into the
> right places. I don't see the need for any additional support for git
> here.

But the original point by Andreas was that third-party tools like "git
work" should be able to just say "make install", and of course the distro
people can take it from there, but the thing is, distro people can take it
from a very low starting point.  Unless "make install" does not figuire
out how the user's git is configured and installed, it won't be very
useful for end users who do say "make install" for whatever reason,
instead of installing it from their distro.

For example, on my primary development box, I do not have any git
installed from distribution, but I do have git on my $PATH.  For such
users, "make install" should be able to find out that the right place to
install git-work.1 is in $HOME/some/where/man/man1 directory.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]