Re: RFC: a plugin architecture for git extensions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:15:50PM +1000, Jon Seymour wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >> My thoughts about this are inspired by how the node project manages
> >> packages with its npm package manager and also the fact that I have
> >> several ideas on the boil at the moment that would definitely benefit
> >> from a standard way to manage these concerns.
> >
> > Sounds like you have a plan ;-)
> >
> 
> Ok, here we go:
> 
>     https://github.com/jonseymour/gpm
> 
> Anyone who violently objects to the suggested name of a package
> manager interface - gpm, please speak up now because it'll be easier
> to change now.

I'm not objecting, but when I see gpm, I think of the mouse daemon for
Linux virtual consoles[0] and whose git clone address also ends in gpm.

I find a name like gem (git extension manager) nicer, though that's
taken by ruby.

[0] http://www.nico.schottelius.org/software/gpm/

   cmn

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]