On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 01:19:32PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Stefan Sperling venit, vidit, dixit 19.04.2011 11:31: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:55:18AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >>> Stefan Sperling <stsp@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> > >>>> -DESIGN PHILOSOPHY > >>>> ------------------ > >>>> -Merge tracking in Subversion is lacking and doing branched development > >>>> -with Subversion can be cumbersome as a result. While 'git svn' can > >>>> track > >>> > >>> Agreed (this and the rest of the patch). Users reading git-svn's doc > >>> don't want a dissertation about how bad SVN is, and if they do, they can > >>> read whygitisbetterthanx ;-) > > > > Exactly :) > > > > And they might rather want to learn more about how Subversion has improved > > since version 1.4. It seems that these parts of the text were written > > before Subversion's 1.5 release. SVN is a lot more capable now than the > > git-svn docs suggest and I'm surprised that git-svn's development seems > > to have gotten stuck at the 1.4 level of functionality. Not even CentOS > > ships with 1.4 anymore these days. > > > > E.g. git-svn could be taught to generate svn mergeinfo compatible with other > > Subversion clients. It's not easy to come up with a generic mapping between > > the two systems but for some use cases it should be reasonably straightforward. > > This would be a nice improvement towards making git-svn a proper drop-in > > replacement for the standard svn client. Currently, git-svn cannot be > > used without disturbing other users doing merges with Subversion itself > > which is a pity. > > 6abd933 (git-svn: allow the mergeinfo property to be set, 2010-09-24) > > made a first step in that direction so that you can at least add > mergeinfo manually. Interesting. I didn't see this since I'm using the released version. But I've been reading the most recent documentation file. How come the documentation wasn't updated? Is it intentionally not documented yet? > But, git-svn.perl is basically in maintenance mode > it seems, and more work is being done to implement a new svn remote helper. Is there already code for this new helper I can look at? > Also, I think merge tracking wasn't that reliable in svn 1.5 before svn > 1.6, and we try to support older versions. In particular, we want to > support the versions on typical svn hosting sites which are not always > that recent. "Not that reliable" is a pretty fuzzy statement that I cannot really provide a specific answer to. There were various implementation bugs in early 1.5 releases causing miscalculations of mergeinfo. Those were client-side problems. The client calculates mergeinfo and uses it to determine which revisions to request during a merge. The server only stores mergeinfo and does not evaluate it, expect in case of the -g option for "svn log" which makes revisions from merged branches show up in the log output (analogous to how individual branch commits are shown in gitk). So it shouldn't matter much which version of the server a hosting site is running. As long as the server is running some 1.5 release git-svn should, in general, be able to cope just fine. Even with a 1.4 server git-svn could commit svn:mergeinfo properties, though other svn clients won't bother using them until the server and repository format is upgraded. Maybe there was some server-side problem that prevented you from doing something specific? In general it really shouldn't matter. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html