On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:09 -0700, Joshua Juran wrote: > On Apr 13, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Drew Northup wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:16 -0700, Daniel Searles wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I'm curious if Gitbox is in violation of the Git's GPL. > >> http://www.gitboxapp.com/ > >> > >> Thank you, > >> Daniel Searles > >> Tech Support > >> Media Lab, Inc. > > > > Well, it appears that he may have implemented "git" on his own, or at > > the very least he's trying to imply that he did. > > > > http://www.gitboxapp.com/faq.html#gpl > > He very clearly says that he ships Git, not a reimplementation. He also clearly stated that he's not calling git command-line tools... "Gitbox neither links (statically or dynamically) against Git nor uses custom interfaces to interact with it. Git binaries are provided for your convenience only." I'm hoping he'll have a more complete statement for all of us. -- -Drew Northup ________________________________________________ "As opposed to vegetable or mineral error?" -John Pescatore, SANS NewsBites Vol. 12 Num. 59 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html