Re: small git lesson [Was: Re: Revert 737a3bb9416ce2a7c7a4170852473a4fcc9c67e8 ?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:59:14AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > $ git name-rev --refs=refs/tags/v2.6\* 69a07f0b117a40fcc1a479358d8e1f41793617f2
> > 69a07f0b117a40fcc1a479358d8e1f41793617f2 tags/v2.6.39-rc2~3^2~43^2~4
> >
> > so it was introduced just before -rc2.
> 
> $ git tag --contains 69a07f0b117a40fcc1a479358d8e1f41793617f2
> v2.6.39-rc1
> v2.6.39-rc2
huh, I thought git name-rev prefers old[1] refs (similar to describe
prefering newer).

$ for rc in 1 2; do git name-rev --refs=refs/tags/v2.6.39-rc$rc 69a07f0b1; done
69a07f0b1 tags/v2.6.39-rc1~79^2~31^2~4
69a07f0b1 tags/v2.6.39-rc2~3^2~43^2~4

I would prefer the v2.6.39-rc1 name even though it's nearer[1] at
v2.6.39-rc2.

If it should stay as is, what is the best way to find out the oldest
tag?
 
Best regards
Uwe

[1] as in minimizing

	git rev-list 69a07f0b117a..$ref | wc -l

(v2.6.39-rc1 -> 21281; v2.6.39-rc2 -> 21608)

[2] as in minimizing the number of traversing a parent link.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]