Re: [PATCH 0/5] New get_pathspec()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nguyán ThÃi Ngác Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> [PATCH 1/5] Rename functions in preparation for get_pathspec() restructure
>
>   I figure I cannot bring all commands to the new get_pathspec() at
>   once and remove the old one. So instead I rename the old one so that
>   we can have both implementations running in parallel.

Horribly bad move.  Keep the old one running under the same name, and keep
the unconverted ones working the same way without new features.  Introduce
a new infrastructure under a new API function name.

Otherwise you cannot merge in new calles that expect the old
get_pathspec() behaviour.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]