Re: Tracking file metadata in git -- fix metastore or enhance git?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Michael J Gruber wrote:

> Note that etckeeper and metastore predate our notes feature. By now, a
> notes tree is a perfect place to store meta information. You can attach
> notes to blobs perfectly (see textconv-cache). That may be an option for
> a reimplementation, depending on how you want the versioning of the
> files to be related with the versioning of the meta data.

Wouldn't that mean the same content couldn't have one owner in one
commit and a different owner in another commit?

I think the most native-looking way to store metadata associated to
paths is .gitattributes.  It also has the nice feature of allowing a
single attribute to apply to multiple files.  But the tools for
looking them up (e.g., git check-attr) do not get much use yet so they
probably could use a lot of improvement.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]