Re: git: "git stash" changes owners and permissions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:

> How does this "rsync" solve "the wrong order" and "creates windows"
> problems?  It will update the paths in the order rsync happens to discover
> and there is a wondow between the time the first path is updated and the
> whole directory gets finally in sync.

All true.  It's a little better than "git checkout" because rsync
will stage files and then rename them into place rather than leaving
a window with files unlinked[1], but it is not much better.

In fact the rsync was a misleading placeholder.  What I really meant
to convey is that this is not something "git checkout" and "git reset
--hard" are designed to do, and that when this much control is needed,
it can be easier to update files out-of-band.

> If you truly want an atomicity, you can make /etc/interesting-subdir a
> symbolic link that points to either interesting-subdir-{0,1}, do the above
> procedure of yours against interesting-subdir-0 (or 1) that is currently
> not pointed by the symbolic link, and when everything in that one is Ok,
> atomically switch the symbolic link to point at it.

True.  Though in practice, a little race might be considered ok. :)

Thanks for clarifying.
Jonathan

[1] rsync with --files-from can update files in a specific order,
which might be appropriate in some cases.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]