Kevin Ballard <kevin@xxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Kevin Ballard <kevin@xxxxxx> writes: >> >> > This seems unnecessary. `git commit --fixup HEAD` doesn't really make any >> sense at all to run when you can say `git commit --amend` instead, >> >> What about this sequence? >> >> git commit -m 'foo' >> git commit -m 'bar' >> git commit --fixup HEAD~1 >> git commit -m 'baz' >> git commit --fixup HEAD~1 >> >> > You raise a good point. I personally think someone who types that deserves > what he gets, but I have no objection to being intelligent about duplicate > fixup! prefixes. Of course an alternative solution is to fix this on the "rebase -i" side, by building on top of your d3d7a42 (rebase: better rearranging of fixup!/squash! lines with --autosquash, 2010-11-04). Or perhaps we would want to do both. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html