Re: [GSoC 2011] Git Sequencer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephan Beyer wrote:

> I want to mention an issue that I have not foreseen before: merges.
> (You need merges, for example, when doing rebase -i -p ... -p as in
> --preserve-merges.)
>
> When I began, there was code in the "next" branch that added the TODO
> instructions "mark", "reset" and "merge" to do merges properly and I
> based my work on it. The original pieces by JÃrg Sommer can still be
> found here:
> http://repo.or.cz/w/git/sbeyer.git/shortlog/6fabd85e8a777c26f3ae8ce11cb7f4265502ea7f
[etc]

Some more pointers:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/148059
IIRC there's some rough consensus about the design, even if I'm not
sure what it is :).

Of course a dream would be a way to rebase merge conflict resolutions
instead of being limited to replaying conflict-free merges or
resolving conflicts by hand.  But that's a more complex story.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]