Re: [PATCH] Docs gitk: Explicitly mention -d, --date-order option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Junio,

you wrote on 2008-04-18:
> "Clifford Caoile" <piyo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
>> Regarding the documentation patch "[PATCH] Docs gitk: Explicitly
>> mention -d, --date-order option" [1] (2008-04-12), it has not been
>> accepted. Is there problem with this patch?
>>
>> References:
>> [1] http://marc.info/?l=git&m=120799377618677&w=2
> 
> There isn't anything _wrong_ with the patch per se, but the current
> documentation refers you to rev-list page and limits itself to the most
> often used options.
> 
> I was waiting to see that many people jumping up and down saying that the
> omission of --date-order from the "most often used" set was a grave bug
> before applying it.  It hasn't happened.

This thread has helped me finding "-d" (which is gitk-specific). So
here's my vote for the patch, FWIW.

Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]