Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 31.03.2011 21:26: > Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Currently, the "Did you mean..." message suggests "commit:fullpath" >> only. Extend this to show the more convenient "commit:./file" form also. > > If we were to do this, I suspect that with non-empty prefix we should only > show "./$file" form for brevity without aka. This is a end-user facing > message and not meant to help scripts, no? ENOPARSE Do you mean: - replace the old "commit:fullpath" with "commit:./file" or - show the new form only without "aka" (but with the old form) or - show literal "commit:./$file"? I guess you meant the first one. But I left in both forms on purpose: Saying only "commit:./file" does not explain what it means, the "./" part is easy to miss, and the user may not even be aware to be in a subdir. Listing both does not take much space and explains everything. Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html